|
Sergio J. Alarcon & Flynn M. Jennings, Monitoring Costs
Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990:
A Blank Check for
the Coast Guard?, 21 Tul. Mar. L.J.
419 (1997).
Paul H. Avery, State Oil Prevention Laws and Intertanko: When
is State Law Preempted?, 6
Ocean & Coastal L.J. 119
(2001).
Kevin Batik, OPA’s Reach: The Geographic Scope of “Navigable
Waters” Under the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990,
21 Rev. Litig. 419 (2002).
Patrick Bonner, Symposium: Admiralty Law Institute: Confused
Seas: Admiralty Law In The Wake Of Terrorism: Insurance
And Liability Issues Relating To An Oil Spill Caused By Terrorism,
77 Tul. L. Rev. 1157 (2003).
K. Allen Brooks, California Oil Spill Laws in the
Wake of United States v. Locke, 12 U.S.F.
Mar. L.J. 227 (2000).
Brian W. Burke, Admiralty Law – A New Rule for Economic
Loss from Pollution? – Ballard Shipping Co. v.
Beach Shellfish, 32 F.3D 623 (1 st Cir. 1994),
29 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1145 (1995).
Arlene Carrera, Natural Resource Damage Assessments Under
the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 3 Envtl. Law. 251 (1996).
Alison C. Carrigan, The Bill of Attainder Clause: A New Weapon
to Challenge the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 28
B.C. Envtl Aff. L. Rev. 119 (2000).
George M. Chalos, A Practical Guide to the Oil Spill Liability
Trust Fund Claim Submission Procedures, 3 U. Denv.
Water L. Rev. 80 (1999).
Criston Cicala, The Double Hull Requirement
of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Does it Constitute a
Regulatory Taking?, 24 Tul. Mar. L.J. 877 (2000).
Stephen J. Darmody, The Oil Pollution Act’s Criminal
Penalties: On a Collision Course with the Law of the
Sea, 21 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 89 (1993).
W. Eugene Davis, The Role of Federal Courts in Admiralty:
The Challenges Facing The Admiralty Judges of the Lower
Federal Courts, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 1355
(2001).
Mary A. Denison, Does the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 Rise to
the Level of a Taking? How the Court Missed the Boat
in Maritrans, Inc. v. United
States, 5 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 355 (2000).
Michael P. Donaldson, The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Reaction
and Response, 3 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 283 (1992).
Charles S. Donovan & Elizabeth M. Miller, How is OPA 90
Faring from the Vessel Interests’ Perspective?
A Look at the Morris J. Berman Oil Spill and the Current Rule
on Certificates of Financial Responsibility,
7 U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 23 (1994).
William W. Enders, The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: The Financial
Responsibility Requirement – Questioning Congressional
Intent and the Minerals Management Service Interpretation of “Offshore
Facility,” 14
Va. Envtl. L.J. 455 (1995).
Stephen R. Eubank, Patchwork Justice: State Unlimited Liability
Laws in the Wake of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990,
18 Md. J. Int'l L. & Trade
149 (1994).
Robert Force & Jonathan M. Gutoff, Limitation of Liability
in Oil Pollution Cases: In Search of Concursus or Procedural
Alternatives to Concursus, 22 Tul. Mar. L.J. 331
(1998).
Francis J. Gonynor, Six Years Before the Mast: The Evolution
of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 9. U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 105
(1996).
Donald C. Greenman, Limitation of Liability Unlimited,
32 J. Mar. L. & Com. 279 (2001).
Benjamin H. Grumbles & Joan M. Manley, The Oil Pollution
Act of 1990: Legislation in the Wake of a Crisis,
10-FALL Nat. Resources & Env't
35 (1995).
Matthew P. Harrington, Necessary and Proper, But Still Unconstitutional:
The Oil Pollution Act’s Delegation of Admiralty
Power to the States,
48 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1 (1997).
Richard G. Hildreth, Christina Otto Terenzi & Lisa N. Thomas, Evaluation
of the New Carissa Incident for Improvements to State,
Federal, and International Law, 16 J. Envtl. L. & Litig.
81 (2001).
Brian Theodore Holmen, Gatlin Oil Co. v. United States:
A Myopic View of OPA Liability, 42 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.
1893 (2001).
Lawrence I. Kiern, Damages in Maritime Cases: Environmental
Damages Under Federal Law, 72 Tul. L. Rev. 693
(1997).
Lawrence I. Kiern, Liability, Compensation, and Financial
Responsibility Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990:
A Review of the First Decade,
24 Tul. Mar. L. J. 481 (2000).
Ronald Edward Kilroy, Making an Oily Mess Less Messy: Use
of Rule F Concursus to Reduce Oil Spill Litigation Complexity ,
2 Envtl. Law. 665
(1996).
Daniel Kopec & Philip Peterson, Crude Legislation: Liability
and Compensation Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990,
23 Rutgers L.J. 597 (1992).
Alfred J. Kuffler, Prosecution of Maritime Environmental Crimes
Versus OPA-90’s Priority for Response and Spill
Prevention: A Collision Avoidance Proposal,
75 Tul L. Rev. 1623 (2001).
Samara Johnston, Is Ordinary Negligence Enough to be Criminal?
Reconciling United States v. Hanousek
with the Liability Limitation Provisions of the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990, 12 U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 263 (2000).
Keith B. Letourneau & Wesley T. Welmaker, The Oil Pollution
Act of 1990: Federal Judicial Interpretation Through
the End of the Millennium, 12
U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 147 (2000)
Browne Lewis, It’s Been 4380 Days and Counting Since
Exxon Valdez: Is It Time to Change the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990?, 15 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 97 (2001).
Gregg L. McCurdy, An Overview of OPA 1990 and Its Relationship
to Other Laws, 5 U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 423 (1993).
Jeffery D. Morgan, The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: A Look at
Its Impact on the Oil Industry, 6 Fordham Envtl. L.J. 1
(1994).
Michael P. Mullahy, States’ Rights and the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990: A Sea of Confusion?, 25
Hofstra L. Rev. 607 (1996).
Dennis Nixon, Elise Golden & Louise Kane, The Legacy of
the North CapeSpill: A New Legal Environment
for the Tug and Barge Industry, 4 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 209
(1999).
Cynthia L. Quarterman & Daniel J. Poynor, OPA ’90
at Ten, 15-SUM Nat. Resources & Env’t 47 (2000).
Russell V. Randle, The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Its Provisions,
Intents, and Effects, 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 10119 (1991).
Daniel G. Rauh, State Authority Under the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990: Federalist Elixir or Should the Supreme Court
Sink Intertanko v. Locke?, 24 Tul.
Mar. L.J. 323 (1999).
Daniel G. Rauh, Sovereign Immunity, Rule F, and the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990: The Eleventh Circuit Tries to Clear the
Waters in Bouchard Transportation Co. v. Updegraff, 23 Tul.
Mar. L.J. 541 (1999).
J. Scott Richardson, The Search for Bright Lines in Takings
Clause Analysis: Maritrans, Inc. v. United States,
15 J. Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 185
(2000).
Antonio J. Rodriguez & Paul A.C. Jaffe, The Oil Pollution
Act of 1990, 15 Tul. Mar. L.J. 1 (1990).
Mary Katherine Roe, Conoco Inc., v. United States:
A Narrowing of the Sovereign Acts Doctrine?, 3
Ocean & Coastal L.J. 275 (1997).
J. Terence Ryan, The Evolution of Natural Resource Damage
Assessments Under the Oil Pollution Act and the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act,
6 Fordham Envtl. L.J. 29 (1994).
Patricia Simmons Schminke, The Oil Pollution Act of 1990:
Has It Muddied the Waters of Liability Limitation?, 5
U. Balt. J. Envtl. L. 173 (1995).
Timothy Semenoro, To Be an “Incident” or Not an “Incident,” That
is the Question Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990:
Gatlin Oil Co. v. United
States Revisited, 24 Tul. Mar. L.J. 955 (2000).
Wendy B. Silverman, Cleaning Up Polluted Waters: Rhode
Island’s New Oil Pollution Control Act
and Tank Vessel Safety, 31 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 625 (1998).
Hutson Smelley, OPA ‘90 Liability in the Aftermath of
an Oil Spill, 12 U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 1 (2000).Dennis J. Stone, The
Limitation of Liability Act: Time to Abandon Ship?, 32 J.
Mar. L. & Com. 317 (2001).
James M. Stuhltrager, Combating Terrorism In The Environmental
Trenches: Responding To Terrorism: Oil Pollution And
Environmental Terrorism - An Overview Of The Potential Legal
Response In The United
States, 9 Wid. L. Symp. J. 401 (2003).
Steven R. Swanson, OPA 90 + 10: The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
After Ten Years, 32 J. Mar L. & Com. 135 (2001).
Trey D. Tankersly, The Robins Dry Dock Rule: The Tar Baby
of Maritime Tort Law, 25 Tul. Mar. L.J. 371 (2000).
Cameron H. Totten, Recovery for Economic Loss Under Robins
Dry Dock and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Sekco Energy,
Inc. v. M/V Margaret Chouest, 18
Tul. Mar. L.J. 167 (1993).
Shannon A. Vahle, Recovery of Monitoring Costs Under the OPA:
Money for Nothing, 7 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 83 (2000).
Michael F. Vitt, United States v. Locke: After a
Rough Passage, Intertanko Crosses the Bar of State Regulation
to Reach the Safe Harbor of Preemption,
25 Tul. Mar. L.J. 573 (2001).
Eileen M. Voegele, United States v. Hyundai Merchant Marine
Co.: Big Brother is Watching – But Who Should
Pay for his Monitoring Costs?, 11 Vill.
Envtl. L.J. 495 (2000).
Thomas J. Wagner, Recoverable Damages Under the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990, 5 U.S.F. Mar. L.J. 283 (1993).
R. Brent Walton & Daniel J. Gunter, United States v.
Locke: The Supreme Court Preempts States from Protecting
Their Navigable Water and Marine Resources from Oil Tanker Spills,
15 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 37
(2000).
Cynthia M. Wilkinson, L. Pittman & Rebecca F. Dye, Slick
Work: An Analysis of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990,
12 J. Energy Nat. Resources & Envtl.
L. 181 (1992).
John M. Woods, Third-Party Liability Under OPA 90: Have the
Courts Veered Off-Course?, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 1863 (1999).
Jaclyn A. Zimmermann, Inadequacies in the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990: Why the United StatesShould Adopt
the Convention on Civil Liability , 23 Fordham
Int’l L.J. 1499 (2000).
|
